But what does this mean? Let’s take a look at our cart object again. If we break it down, the entire cart can be composed of many ‘sub-items’ that can also exist as stand-alone items. The cart process involves multiple parts that may or may not be needed, depending on context and situational requirements.
In a composite pattern, an object can have a leaf and/or a composite. A leaf is the object’s implementations while a composite is the child object.
So if you look at it in the form of a tree diagram, a composite pattern looks something like this:
The composite structural pattern keeps the relationships and hierarchies of the objects (composites) together. However, you can take a branch and create ‘part-whole’ objects out of them.
For example, if you take Composite2 and its associated branches, the object created will be a hybrid solution of Composite2 and Composite3. Leaf3 is the actual object methods and properties of Composite2.
So why separate it out and call it a leaf? Why not just have it as part of the composite? Because the composite node itself contains information that helps makes the connection with the child composite. The leaf is a visual representation of the composite’s object.
This post is for paying subscribers only
Sign up now and upgrade your account to read the post and get access to the full library of posts for paying subscribers only.